The Benefits of Environmental Protection

From Thermal-FluidsPedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with '==References== ==Further Reading== ==External Links==')
 
(2 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Depending on how one views the environment, different values can be placed on protecting it. The utilitarian considers the value of the environment only as long as it brings him happiness. Anything that does not affect him directly has little immediate value to him. Therefore, nobody can be easily persuaded to pay for expenses today even though he might eventually be rewarded by cheaper products, better health, and a more pleasant environment. The environmental ethicist, on the other hand, sees protecting the environment as a moral issue; the environment belongs not only to us, but also to all living organisms and to all future generations. Society should seek to protect it whether it directly benefits today’s humans or not ([[#Additional Comments|a]]).
 +
 +
Environmental protection has both market benefits and non-market benefits and may be broken down into values for generating revenues, providing non-monetary services to the community (use value), presenting unknown potential benefits (option value), and preserving the environment even if it does not benefit us directly (existence value). An example of the use value of a lake is an increase in the number of water sport enthusiasts, swimmers, and fishermen who use the lake. An example of option value is its value to future generations and the possibility that saving the environment and its ecological systems may one day provide the key to a currently non-curable disease. The existence value of the lake is the value individuals place on simply saving the ecosystem because of our belief that other creatures -- animals and plants -- have the same inherent right to these resources as humans.
 +
==References==
==References==
 +
 +
(1) Toossi Reza, "Energy and the Environment:Sources, technologies, and impacts", Verve Publishers, 2005
 +
 +
==Additional Comments==
 +
 +
(a) The differentiation between utilitarians and environmentalists only makes sense when basic human needs are satisfied. The poor have not seen any point in protecting the environment, as they do not receive much of the benefits. When poor countries are given sufficient incentives, their attitude will necessarily change and they will see the value of environmental protection and conservation.
==Further Reading==
==Further Reading==
 +
 +
Chapman, D., Environmental Economics: Theory, Application, and Policy,” Addison-Wiley, 2000.
 +
 +
Goodstein, E. S., Economics and the Environment, 4th Ed., John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
 +
 +
Siebert, H., Economics of the Environment: Theory and Policy, Springer Verlog, 2004.
 +
 +
Dauvergne, P., Handbook of Global Environmental Politics, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2005.
 +
 +
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM), the journal of Association of Environmental and Resource Economics.
 +
 +
Ecological Economics – Direct Science Elsevier Publishing Company, the journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE).
 +
 +
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies – Published by Springer-Verlog, New York is the official journal of the Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
==External Links==
==External Links==
 +
 +
US Agency for International Development (http://www.usaid.gov/)
 +
 +
National Center for Environmental Economics (http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eed.nsf/pages/homepage).
 +
 +
United Nations Development Program (http://www.undp.org).
 +
 +
United Nations Environment Programme (http://www.unep.org).
 +
 +
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (http://www.ipcc.ch).
 +
 +
World Resource Institute (http://www.wri.org)
 +
 +
Union of Concerned Scientists (http://www.ucsusa.org).

Current revision as of 20:24, 19 July 2010

Depending on how one views the environment, different values can be placed on protecting it. The utilitarian considers the value of the environment only as long as it brings him happiness. Anything that does not affect him directly has little immediate value to him. Therefore, nobody can be easily persuaded to pay for expenses today even though he might eventually be rewarded by cheaper products, better health, and a more pleasant environment. The environmental ethicist, on the other hand, sees protecting the environment as a moral issue; the environment belongs not only to us, but also to all living organisms and to all future generations. Society should seek to protect it whether it directly benefits today’s humans or not (a).

Environmental protection has both market benefits and non-market benefits and may be broken down into values for generating revenues, providing non-monetary services to the community (use value), presenting unknown potential benefits (option value), and preserving the environment even if it does not benefit us directly (existence value). An example of the use value of a lake is an increase in the number of water sport enthusiasts, swimmers, and fishermen who use the lake. An example of option value is its value to future generations and the possibility that saving the environment and its ecological systems may one day provide the key to a currently non-curable disease. The existence value of the lake is the value individuals place on simply saving the ecosystem because of our belief that other creatures -- animals and plants -- have the same inherent right to these resources as humans.

Contents

References

(1) Toossi Reza, "Energy and the Environment:Sources, technologies, and impacts", Verve Publishers, 2005

Additional Comments

(a) The differentiation between utilitarians and environmentalists only makes sense when basic human needs are satisfied. The poor have not seen any point in protecting the environment, as they do not receive much of the benefits. When poor countries are given sufficient incentives, their attitude will necessarily change and they will see the value of environmental protection and conservation.

Further Reading

Chapman, D., Environmental Economics: Theory, Application, and Policy,” Addison-Wiley, 2000.

Goodstein, E. S., Economics and the Environment, 4th Ed., John Wiley & Sons, 2002.

Siebert, H., Economics of the Environment: Theory and Policy, Springer Verlog, 2004.

Dauvergne, P., Handbook of Global Environmental Politics, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2005.

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM), the journal of Association of Environmental and Resource Economics.

Ecological Economics – Direct Science Elsevier Publishing Company, the journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE).

Environmental Economics and Policy Studies – Published by Springer-Verlog, New York is the official journal of the Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.

External Links

US Agency for International Development (http://www.usaid.gov/)

National Center for Environmental Economics (http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eed.nsf/pages/homepage).

United Nations Development Program (http://www.undp.org).

United Nations Environment Programme (http://www.unep.org).

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (http://www.ipcc.ch).

World Resource Institute (http://www.wri.org)

Union of Concerned Scientists (http://www.ucsusa.org).